I arrived there not as a tourist or visitor, but as someone tasked with conducting a survey — a study meant to measure “vulnerability levels” in the community. The brief was simple on paper: collect numbers, fill forms, compile data. But the reality was different. Numbers can tell you something, but they can never tell you everything.
In villages like Ampalnagar, I didn’t just stand at doorsteps ticking boxes. I sat on woven mats, under the shade of mango trees, listening. Mothers shared stories of children they lost and children they were raising alone. Elders spoke of years in displacement camps. Young men and women carried a quiet determination, even as they recounted the days when they had nothing but the clothes on their backs.
The survey became less about “fieldwork” and more about “human work.” I wasn’t there merely as an officer. I was there as a witness, a listener, a fellow human being trying to understand. While some focused purely on process — clipboards, questions, signatures — I focused on connection.
Sometimes, listening was the greatest help I could offer. Other times, it meant linking someone to an aid worker, a schoolteacher, or a medical volunteer. The data we collected was important, but it was the human connection that allowed that data to have meaning.
A photograph from those days reminds me still: the true capacity to serve is not just about technical skill. It’s about empathy, patience, and the courage to sit with someone’s pain without looking away.
Because when you go beyond the numbers and truly hear the heartbeat of a community, you don’t just understand their needs — you feel them. And when you feel them, you act differently. You act as if their future depends on it. Because, in many ways, it does.
No comments:
Post a Comment